> Or perhaps we should by default restrict short ones to simple > operators, since it's pretty obvious that [+] is doing *some* kind > of addition, while [EMAIL PROTECTED]&$*#«=] is not quite so obvious. In other > words, we apply some kind of Huffman amplification to the metaoperator, > where the rich stay rich, but the poor get poorer. Or something > like that. I always admired the Great Dalmutti as a game that has > the gall (or sense of reality) to prejudice itself in favor of the > overdogs rather than the underdogs. If we we were more democratic, > we'd require "reduce" on the short ones instead of the long ones. :-)
I like this idea. It provides more huffman-coding for readability. Rob
