On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:38:45AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:24:16AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:46:03PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: > : Is using wrap/call the correct choice here, or is there another way
: > : to do it that I missed?
: >
: > wrap/call should do what you want there, but if you want to hack in
: > &func.goto, that'd be good too.
:
: Done as r804. It also passes the expected context ("want") of its
: original caller to &func, which I assume is the correct behaviour.
Yes.
Larry
