Dan Brian wrote:
If I went with "get", the opposite would be "unget" for both historical and huffmaniacal reasons.
But "get" has too strong a class accessor connotation in most OO.
"unpull?" ;-)
pushf/popf. f is for "front". But I still don't see anything wrong with shift/unshift.
I'd prefer to avoid having a group of words that all mean about the same thing, but keeping them straight requires some memory trick. I program in too many languages to keep my mnemonics straight. There's going to be enough fun with is/has/does/but. For reference, I always have to do a 'perldoc perlvar' when I need a P5 $<punct>.
-- Rod Adams
