On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:12:32PM +0100, Juerd wrote: : But if mixed «>> is allowed, isn't that «<<»syntax error? Or did I : misinterpret the answer re mixing them?
Uh, I wasn't aware that I'd actually answered the question. :-) My actual inclination is to disallow it. I was just trying to argue myself out of that position. Bad habit of mine, thinking out loud. : > my macro circumfix:«<< >>» is gone; : : Perhaps "is gone" is a bit too easy for something that shouldn't be : done. Okay, make it "is obliterated_after_grave_consideration_of_the_consequences". Larry
