On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Luke Palmer wrote: > Austin Hastings writes: > > Larry Wall wrote: > > >Hmm. Gotta decided if S$foo.bar() is too ugly to live though... > > > > It is. > > Agreed.
Though IMHO Perl has a long history of syntax allowances too ugly to live, and yet, as long as they are not *enforced*, I don't think they make a major problem, i.e. most people would write C<< S $foo.bar() >> anyway. Michele -- No one can ever predict all of the possible error conditions, of course; as soon as we write idiot-proof code, along comes a better idiot. But it's still worth making the attempt. - Sherm Pendley in clpmisc (edited)
