On Wednesday 14 July 2004 12:58 pm, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> Andrew Rodland wrote:
> > So if we have @x = [1, 3, 5, 6 .. 9, 10 .. Inf, 42];
>
> ...
>
> > 42 is just one number, so questions of indexing
> > it are moot, but its "distance" from the left is Inf. So, there's no way
> > to access the 42 by any positive index of @x, and no way to ever get it
> > by successive "shift".
>
> Sure, but shouldn't @x[-1] give 42?

Yeah. If I didn't write that, I certainly meant it.

--Andrew

Reply via email to