--- Jonadab the Unsightly One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Speaking of objects... are we going to have a built-in object > >> forest, like Inform has, where irrespective of class any given > >> object can have up to one parent at any given time, > > > > Multiple parent classes, yes. > > Not remotely the same thing. > > > Parent objects, no. > > Oh, well.
Of course, how hard can it be to implement the .parent property? You'll want it on just about everything, though, so the change will probably be to CORE::MetaClass. It still shouldn't be that hard to do. Maybe Luke Palmer will post a solution... :-) =Austin
