On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 02:26, Mark Lentczner wrote: > It is clear that there is a missing "list > concatenate" operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that > is already taken by "smart match". On the other hand, perhaps comma > fills this role - though I couldn't find my way through the discussion > on comma to know where it now stands.
Actually, since comma is now an operator for list construction, I suppose ,= would certainly have a clear enough meaning. Still, I'm not sure everything needs to be operatorified. Is push so hard to use? -- Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith "It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!'" -Shriekback
