Re: idiom for filling a counting hash

[Luke Palmer]

Damian Conway writes:
> Austin Hastings wrote:
> 
> >Hmm. For junctions I was thinking:
> >
> >  ++ all([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
> >
> >Which is almost readable.
> 
> But unfortunately not correct. Junctions are value, not lvalues.
> 
> This situation is exactly what hyperoperators are for:
> 
>     ++Â [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Er, did the hyper operator's direction flip?  I thought it was:

    ++Â [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Luke