[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthijs Van Duin) writes:
> OK, I suppose that works although that still means you're moving the
> complexity from the perl implementation to its usage: in this case,
> the perl 6 parser which is written in perl 6
No, I don't believe that's what's happening. My concern is that at some
point, there *will* need to be a bootstrapped parser which is written in
some low level language, outputting Parrot bytecode, and it *will* need
to be able to reconfigure itself mid-match.
I think. I can't remember why I'm so convinced of this, and I'm too tired
to think it through with examples right now, and I might be wrong anyway,
but at least I can be ready with a solution if it proves necessary. :)
--
"There is no safe investment. To love at all is to be vulnerable. ...
The only place outside Heaven where you can be perfectly safe from all the
dangers and pertubations of love is Hell."
-CS Lewis "The Four Loves"
