Luke Palmer wrote:

Well, if you did that, it surely couldn't be polymorphic,  which kind
of defeats most of the purpose of making it a method.

I disagree. Consider the "template method" patten. This uses a non-polymorphic method in a base class to invoke a set of polymorphic methods in a standard sequence. I would consider my "macromethod" in a similar vain.


Dave.
--
http://dave.whipp.name



Reply via email to