On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 02:54 PM, Dave Whipp wrote:
I think that is covered by C<~~>. As long as we can create class-specific variants of smart matching, we're fine.There's actually a fourth concept: two (different) objects represent the same value. (Actually, its the generalization of [1] and [2]).
I don't know that I'd want to use C<eq> for this. It's possible that you want stringification to do something not entirely normalized/canonical.
MikeL
