On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:45:52PM +0200, Markus Laire wrote: > You are making the fundamental mistake of thinking superpositions as > superpositions. When thinking them as another-kind-of or/and, their > usefulness comes a lot clearer.
> perl5: if $x > 0 && $x < 20 && $y > 0 && $y < 20 && $z > 0 && $z < 20 > perl6: if 0 < $x & $y & $z < 20 I find that really quite confusing written like that. but like this if 0 < ($x & $y & $z) < 20 it makes more sense to me. What's the precedence? Although as regular user of numerical bitops in C, I find it visually jarring that & isn't what it means in C, C++, perl and most other current languages. Nicholas Clark -- Brainfuck better than perl? http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/
