On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi folks! > > I did some tests with the new for loop and don't understand some of > the results. Perhaps this is just due to some warts in the > implementation at the moment.
Yes. I personally think it makes more sense, in a language that allows infinite and/or lazy lists, to use the length of the shorter of the two streams, so that's what I did. When I implemented this, I had forgotten the Apocalypse passage mandating the other behavior. You're welcome to change it if you want ;). /s
