[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>> sub hidden (str $name, int $force, int $override is aka($force))
>>   { ... }
> 
> 
> Would the following be simpler...?
> 
>  sub hidden (str $name, int $force is aka($override))
>    { ... }

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Sorry. I've travelled 14,000 miles and given 93 hours of
presentations in the last 18 days. [Note to self: no more
posting whilst semi-conscious!!!]

%-)


> BTW, the aka thing is cool.  It could be complementary to "is named":
> 
>  # can't use force_tainted as argument:
>  sub hidden (int $force_tainted is named($force))
> 
>  # can use force_tainted as argument:
>  sub hidden (int $force_tainted is aka($force))

Yes, that was the idea. :-)

Damian

Reply via email to