--- Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, this is one thing that has troubled me > about the new regex rules, and I've mentioned it > before. I would still like for there to be > a "reverse /x" switch, that would tell the > regex that I want it to treat whitespace > literally
Doesn't the :w option do that? :w/one two/ translates to /one \s+ two/ cheers, Stephen Rawls __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
