Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> >The rest of this message assumes that the answer to A is "run time error".
>> 
>> I'm not sure that's correct. Might just be a runtime warning,
>
> I would assume not. How can we optimize if we just make it a
> warning? 

By only optimizing in the presence of C<use strict 'types'> perhaps?


-- 
Piers

   "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
    possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
         -- Jane Austen?

Reply via email to