Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >The rest of this message assumes that the answer to A is "run time error". >> >> I'm not sure that's correct. Might just be a runtime warning, > > I would assume not. How can we optimize if we just make it a > warning?
By only optimizing in the presence of C<use strict 'types'> perhaps? -- Piers "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite." -- Jane Austen?