On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:34:12 +0000, Simon Cozens wrote: >Should we be allowed to use _ to group numbers, now that _ is concat? >If not _, then what? (if anything?)
I don't really understand your question. Currently, "." is used for
concat and that doesn't inhibit using it in a number, does it? Or what
would you suppose that 3.14 means?
Quite the countrary: ("100" . "000") as a number is indeed 100000, as is
100_000. So there's *less* of a conflict than today, in perl5.
--
Bart.
