On Sunday 20 January 2002 21:43, Larry Wall wrote:
>
> I think it's too easy to have accidental non-void contexts, which is
> why I'm wanting to outlaw bare blocks at the statement level. But I
> don't think that fact influences your argument one way or the other.
> There's definitely some merit in what you say--I'm just not sure the
> distant context should outweigh the close context when the block could
> be arbitrarily long.
My concern is that we're simply replacing one set of questions ("why doesn't
this work the way I expect") with another set of questions ("why doesn't
this work the way I expect"). I'm sure that would hold true for any amount
of change, so I want to be prepared with the rationale and explanations.
Thanks for answering my queries.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
