On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, David Whipp wrote: > ..... I know it uses valuable characters, but adding C<chomp?> to > identify a query, and C<chomp!> for an operation does not seem > unreasonable.
What about 'chomp?' for query but 'chomp' (no decoration) for operation? I think using ? on method names is kind of cute. :-) - D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
