On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 22:42, Damian Conway wrote:
> Brent asked:
>
> > If we have 'and', 'or' and 'xor', can we have 'dor' (defined or) to be a
> > low-precedence version of this?
>
> I actually suggested exactly that to Larry a few weeks back.
>
> He likes the idea, but is having trouble finding an acceptable name for the
> operator.
I think the time has come, at last, to suggest a new operator -- and
perhaps this would be a good place for it. We need the 'doh' operator.
And to borrow from another thread, we might even be able to say
doh!
;-)
David
--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15726394
Yahoo!: dew7e
Jabber:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
