On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 04:39:47PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > Sigh. I *do* see your point of view (Laziness), but I still have immense > difficulty with the notion that: > > $x == NaN > > doesn't return true if $x contains NaN.
I agree. The difficulty I have is that it is the comparison that IEEE
define to return false. Which means
if ('cat' != 'dog')
would not yeild the same result as
unless('cat' == 'dog')
Which I think would lead to a lot of confusion when debugging.
Graham.
