> Well, my head is definitely spinning. :) Thanks, Damian. Just doing my job, Citizen.
;-) > One oversight (on one of our parts - you either didn't put it in or I > didn't see it. :)): it looks like the example uses the new ";" operator > (between the mandatory and option arguments in the function declaration?), > but it's not mentioned anywhere in the text, nor is ';' listed in the > bullet list at the end . . . That's because it will be covered when Larry gets to multi-dimensional arrays in a later Apocalypse. The amount of Larry has revealed about the C<;> operator is insufficient to properly exegese it yet. Damian
