>>>>> "BL" == Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BL> On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 13:02:04 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >>> Uri mentioned exp(x) = e^x, but I think if you are going to include >>> log2, log10, log, etc, you should also include ln. >> >> Added. BL> Er... aren't ln and log synonyms? we are using log as in log( base, num ) where you can specify the log base. ln is just log( e, num ). same for log2 and log10. those are just the most common bases for logs. no reason not to support all of them in parrot as they are trivial wrappers (and they save an argument per call). they can also be in the math module where again they will be simple wrappers. uri -- Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com SYStems ARCHitecture and Stem Development ------ http://www.stemsystems.com Search or Offer Perl Jobs -------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Brian Wheeler
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Uri Guttman
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Jeremy Howard
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Uri Guttman
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Michael G Schwern
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Brent Dax
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Bart Lateur
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) David Whipp
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Uri Guttman
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Eric Roode
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Hong Zhang