At 10:04 AM 9/5/2001 +1100, Damian Conway wrote: >Dan wrote: >Why not C<delete>? It merely requires that the internals equivalent of: [Snippy] >I don't understand why you think that's particularly wormy? Ah, but what people will want is: my $x = "foo\n"; { my $x = "bar\n"; delete $MY::{'$x'}; print $x; } to print foo. That's where things get tricky. Though I suppose we could put some sort of placeholder with auto-backsearch capabilities. Or something. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dave Mitchell
- RE: What's up with %MY? Garrett Goebel
- RE: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Me
- Re: What's up with %MY? Ken Fox
- Re: What's up with %MY? Uri Guttman
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- RE: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Uri Guttman
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski