On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: > Are prototypes going to be checked at runtime now? For methods, at least. Dunno about subs, that's Larry's call. I could make a good language case for and against it. It adds overhead on sub calls, which is a bad thing generally. (I'd be OK with the declaration "All prototyped subs must have their prototypes known before the BEGIN phase is done"... :) Dan
- Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Prototypes Damian Conway
- Re: Prototypes Michael G Schwern
- Re: Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Prototypes Dan Sugalski
- Re: Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Prototypes Dan Sugalski
- Re: Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Prototypes Dan Sugalski
- Re: Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Prototypes Dan Sugalski
- Re: Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Prototypes Ken Fox
- Re: Prototypes Dan Sugalski
- Re: Prototypes Bryan C . Warnock