> My personal preference would be for all such properties (traits?) to be
> reserved across all types - eg using 'prompt' on a hash gives a
> compile/run time error. This allows the compiler to catch certain types
> of typo and thinko, and also allows us to expand in future - eg when
> some P6Per comes up with a bright idea on how prompts can be made
> applicable to hashes, we dont have the familar argument "but we can't
> do that, it may break code that defines a user property called
> 'prompt'".
I could imagine the same types of warnings on all-lowercase traits/properties
as on lowercase barewords. That is: let them be, by convention, reserved for
(future) built-ins.
> PS - I *really* like the traits proposal.
Me too :-)
Damian
