> in ?:: or any other condition checking block, 0 is true, everything else
is
> false. I am yet to see why otherwise or any third condition is needed.
If
> that's then we can have 4 conditions 1,0,-1,undef, and we can keep going.
> That is why there are conditions, if you want to check for -1 you must
> specifically do it.
>
> if($foo == 1)
> {}
> elsif ($foo == -1)
> {}
> elsif (!$foo)
> {}
> else
> {}
]- then why to use "else-elseif" at all when we can use "goto" instead..:")
... why the languages use two-state(boolean 1/0) when they can use
one-state(1) and still have their work done.... SHORCUTs/PATTERNs that is
....
> I know this is a dead issue, but I just can't see how some people actually
> see the logic in having three conditions 1,0,-1. What about -2, -3,
etc...
> The whole purpose in ?:: is to deferentiate between true or false, weather
> it be 1|0 2|0, -1|0, doesn't matter is still true or false.
]- it is not -2,-3 ... it is -1,0,1 or if u want
t -infinity,0,+infinity... tristate ... forgot about boolean for one
moment...
IT IS SHORCUT.
ok.... i'ill not urge u more....enought... see... but what about.....if ...
we can... can we ?... ok let's talk about something else.
thanx for your time.
=====
iVAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====
