raptor wrote:
> 
>  for my $el1, $el2 ( @foo, @bar ) {

Hopefully you mean

   for my $el1, my $el2 ( @foo, @bar ) {

or maybe 

   for [ my $el1, my $el2 ] ( @foo, @bar ) {

And yes, it's an old idea.


> PS. I was thinking of that before, what if we have something let's call it
> 'transform' for transformation of any structure to other structure.. 

This sort of thing should certainly not be in the kernel.

-- 
John Porter

Reply via email to