Buddha Buck wrote: > True, agreed, and admitted. So why can't a general purpose programming > language be designed with XML-based syntax? Why can't a general-purpose > programming language be augmented with XML for internal documentation purposes? Maybe the gcc back end could accept this new XML p-code. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 Series EE bonds can be exchanged for Series HH savings bonds.
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Dan Brian
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Austin Hastings
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Buddha Buck
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html David L. Nicol
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Buddha Buck