At 12:05 PM 6/25/2001 -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
>At 11:44 AM 6/25/01 -0700, David Whipp wrote:
>>Can anyone see any problems with making C<bless> and
>>C<ref> work with lists? C<isa> is not effected. We
>>might want some magic to ensure 'ref($foo) eq "bar"'
>>still works as expected.
>
>What's wrong with multiple inheritance?
Nothing, but he wants MI on a per-object basis, rather than a per-class
basis, presumably to avoid having to create a zillion classes who's sole
purpose in life is to have an @ISA array.
Sounds sensible, and worth sending past Damian.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Multiple classifications of an object David Whipp
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Gregory Williams
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Michael G Schwern
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Peter Scott
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Michael G Schwern
- RE: Multiple classifications of an object David Whipp
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Damian Conway
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- ALLCAPS subs, properties, etc (Re: Multiple cla... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Trond Michelsen
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Michael G Schwern
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Damian Conway
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object David L. Nicol
- RE: Multiple classifications of an object David Whipp
