Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture)

[Me]

> On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:38:24PM -0500, Me wrote:
> > Question 1:
> > 
> > Afaict, even with use strict at its most strict, perl 6
> > can't (in practice) complain, at compile time, if
> > 
> >         $foo.Foun
> > 
> >     refers to an undeclared Foun.
> > 
> > Right?
> 
> Can't you hear the low roar from the strong-typing argument coming
> from the thread next door?

Yes. Indeed the volume quite startled me...

I.Found your notion of a "sealed off namespace"
intriguing. I have no idea what it meant just yet;
I'm going to go read and think about it now.