Michael G Schwern wrote: > > % perl -e '$r=\%h; print @$r' > > Not an ARRAY reference at -e line 1. > > This isn't type-checking (semantical arguments > /dev/null), Heed your own redirection, eh? > its more like basic syntax. No, it's not. If it were, then it would be caught at compile time. > You don't want to try holding up prototypes and dereference checks to > Java's typing system and try to claim its in the same league, or even > the same sport. As I said before, it boils down to the fact that perl's notion of a "type" is different from other languages. It *does* check these types, and it "casts" very opportunistically. -- John Porter "Anything essential is invisible to the eyes."
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Piers Cawley
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture Garrett Goebel
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture David Whipp
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Simon Cozens