On Tue, 8 May 2001, Me wrote: > yes? > > And, despite perl5's use of no as the opposite > of use, and given that there may be no use in > perl6 (;>), and thus perhaps no no, (on and off?), > then maybe no could be used as not yes? > > no? Your Honor, I would like to stipulate that that sentence be taken out and shot. ;> Dave
- Re: apo 2 John Porter
- Re: apo 2 Tad McClellan
- RE: apo 2 Buddha Buck
- RE: apo 2 David Whipp
- Re: apo 2 Rocco Caputo
- Re: apo 2 John Porter
- Re: apo 2 Simon Cozens
- Re: apo 2 John Porter
- Re: apo 2 Larry Wall
- Re: apo 2 Me
- Re: apo 2 Dave Storrs
- Re: apo 2 Larry Wall
- Re: apo 2 Me
- Re: apo 2 John Porter
- Re: apo 2 Me
- Re: apo 2 nick
- Re: apo 2 John Porter