Nathan Wiger wrote: > > Truthfully, I've always liked the <>'s (and personally don't think we need a > qw alternative), so I'd rather we stay with: > > $a = <$b>; # same as next $b or $b.next we could generalize the other direction and have angles be a standard shortcut for the "next" method: while (($k,$v) = each %sack){ ... ($k,$v) = <%sack> or last; ... }; what else _has_ iterators?
- Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Michael G Schwern
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns James Mastros
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Graham Barr
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns James Mastros
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Michael G Schwern
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Graham Barr
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re[2]: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns A. C. Yardley
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Siracusa
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Richard Proctor