On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:32:40PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> Since it's something underlying Perl, I'd suggest a decrement of
> "Perl", which would of course be "Perk".  The Java engine would have
> to be "Perj", I guess, which seems fitting somehow.

Shouldn't the Java engine be "Perk" (or perhaps "Perc") is that just
too fitting?


-- 

Michael G. Schwern   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       Kwalitee Is Job One
That which stirs me, stirs everything.
        -- Squonk Opera, "Spoon"

Reply via email to