From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> At 05:22 PM 5/3/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> >David L. Nicol wrote:
> > > is sandboxing something a language should support
> > > at all, or is it best left to the OS to provide
> > > a solid chroot facility?
> >
> >IMHO this is one of those things that should be kept firmly
> >in the front of our minds as we design the engine.
> >It is yet another area in which we could do right what java
> >got half-right.
>
> The biggest problem I have with sandboxing is that to do it right is
> apparently difficult, judging by the number of people that
> get it wrong. We need to rope in a security expert, I think, for
> the design.
A Language-Based Approach to Security:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rwh/papers/langsec/dagstuhl.pdf
ResearchIndex is a fun site to explore:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/volpano98language.html
Java influenced papers:
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/sip/pub/
