John Porter wrote: > We could y/$@%/@%$/ ... ... and create an alternate parser able to handle the full internal internals API. I have finally figured out the main motivation behind the whole perl6 effort: the obfuscated perl contests were getting repetitive. Good night.
- Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... John Siracusa
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overl... David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overl... John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overl... John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overl... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Graham Barr
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overl... John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Russ Allbery
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overl... Jonathan Scott Duff