On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:42:43PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Uri Guttman wrote:
> >
> > on the other hand, i use .= all the time and wouldn't like to lose
> > it. schwern idea of ce doesn't work for me as only the op= stuff means
> > assignment and ce would break that (e for = isn't visual enough).
The fastidious ivory tower side of my brain has always disliked the
fact that there is .= for append but no =. for prepend. So if I may
have c= and =c in Perl 6 I will be happy :-) (and of course cc for the
"functional" non-argument-modifying version)
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
