Dan Sugalski wrote: > The one downside is that you'd have essentially your own private language. > Whether this is a bad thing or not is a separate issue, of course. IIUC, this ability is precisely what Larry was saying Perl6 would have. -- John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- RE: Re: Tying & Overloading Brent Dax
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Damien Neil
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Edward Peschko
- Re: Tying & Overloading James Mastros
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Tying & Overloading Andy Dougherty
- Re: Tying & Overloading nick
- Re: Tying & Overloading Austin Hastings