John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley wrote: >> Unless you can get at every single one of those and add a '-M5' switch, >> then they aren't going to work. Which could be very bad indeed. > The analogous situation with p4->p5 wasn't so bad. People just kept > their p4 binaries around for running those old scripts. No biggie. There's quite a lot more Perl 5 code out there than there was Perl 4 code. And it's rather annoying to still be maintaining a perl4 installation at this point for the stragglers, although I suppose that can't be helped. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 jc vazquez
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Buddha Buck
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brian Wheeler
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto