Dan Sugalski wrote: > :contained. Or possibly :irrelevant, since generally speaking most people > won't use it and the optimizer will have to infer whether it's safe to not > execute the function every time... It shouldn't necessarily have to. If I *tell* it it's safe, that should be the end of the story. It don't get much more optimal than that. -- John Porter
- Re: pitching names for the attribute for a function with no... Dan Sugalski
