On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 08:25:17AM -0800, Peter Scott wrote: > I'm kinda puzzled by the focus on Schwartzian when I thought the GRT was > demonstrated to be better. Because the <insert name here> transform is a specialized case of the schwartzian transform where the default sort is sufficient. Address the issues with the general case, and the specialized case is handled as well. Z.
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Brian
- RE: Schwartzian Transform Brent Dax
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Mark Koopman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Simon Cozens
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Peter Scott
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Adam Turoff
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Simon Cozens
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Adam Turoff
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Simon Cozens
- Re: Schwartzian Transform indigo
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Uri Guttman