Johan Vromans wrote: > > If a Perl construct does not suffer from a slight change that makes > it easier to accept by new programmers, I think such changes should > be seriously considered. Yes; but the world if full of language [sorry, couldn't resist] which is optimized (or at least meant to be) for the learner; Larry wants Perl to be optimized for the programmer. Unfortunately, to the two optimizations are mostly disjoint. -- John Porter Fortunaut
- The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Branden
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Simon Cozens
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Johan Vromans
- John Porter