On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:40:26PM -0700, Tony Olekshy wrote: > The problem may be that a dynamic always statement means both > "no matter what happens" and "not until later". The static > finally clause just means "no matter what happened" (the effect > is immediate). I'm fond of post, myself. Simply means "subsequent to", literaly (m-w.com, post-, 2a. Yes, I'm anal sometimes.) "Always" makes me say "but when", and "later" seems like the wrong part-of-speech to me. -=- James Mastros -- "All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a safe place." AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
- End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Tony Olekshy
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Glenn Linderman
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. David L. Nicol
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Tony Olekshy
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approac... James Mastros
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Tony Olekshy
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Glenn Linderman
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. John Porter
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approac... Glenn Linderman
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Simon Cozens
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approac... Simon Cozens
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. John Porter
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Simon Cozens
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. schwern
- Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. Simon Cozens