On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:33:05PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > package foo; > use attrs qw(cleanup_sub); > > would be nice, but I don't know that he'll go for it. (Though it's the only > way I can think of to avoid AUTOLOAD being considered a potential destructor) Fiat? It's pretty hard (for me) to think of when you'd want an AUTOLOADed DESTROY, since if you create /any/ objects of the class, DESTROY will be called. "It isn't possible to AUTOLOAD DESTROY." --perlmem(6) -=- James Mastros -- "All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a safe place." AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Piers Cawley
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) John Porter
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) David Mitchell