On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:19:36PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > The less memory you chew through the faster your code will probably be (or > at least you'll have less overhead). Reuse is generally faster and less > resource-intensive than recycling. What's true for tin cans is true for memory. reduce, reuse, recycle. The first R might also be important :-) Nicholas Clark
- Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/P... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Ken Fox
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/P... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Sam Tregar
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Sam Tregar