On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:26:59PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > This is an excellent reason, and one I hadn't considered. I withdraw any > objections. Care to put together a PDD on how it should be handled? > (Including Archive::Tar as part of the base perl distribution's not > inappropriate, assuming we can get permission. ) Do we really want to use tar format (over say cpio) as tar rounds files up to 512 block boundaries, and has some arbitrary restrictions on filename lengths in the headers? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Branden
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Branden
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Branden
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Bart Lateur
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...) Branden