Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

[John Porter]

Peter Scott wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't clear.  Let me rephrase.  The 'try' helps me determine that 
> the following block is going to be subject to exception handlers which will 
> immediately follow as siblings of the block.  

O.k.  That makes sense if some blocks can be try blocks (by adding the
approprate decoration) and some aren't.
But I don't see the advantage of it if any and every block is
implicitly a try block.

-- 
John Porter