Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

[John Porter]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Hmmm. If there's such an "always" block, I'd like to see it on all blocks,
> including the continue [1]. But then, it becomes hard to figure out to which
> block the always belongs....

That's precisely why these things should be shoved inside
rather than dangling off the end.  JMHO.

-- 
John Porter